Critical Reflection

02/04/2109 14:10pm

From the beginning of this course, I would like to strengthen my weakness in communication which is my sentence structure and choice of words as they are lack of emphasis. During the course, I was tasked with various assignment that helps me to discover and improve my writing. For the various assignments, I had refer to numerous website and YouTube videos on writing style, language and presentation skill.

I had definitely improve my presentation skill and able to present my idea in the shortest time possible with the right opening and closing. During the course, I was able to improve others presentation skills and at the same time to learn from my classmates. We had in-depth discussion on each other presentation.

I realised that I am still very weak in the choice of words and sentences construction hence I will be doing more reading and pick up skills and style in report writing. For my course in civil engineering, there will will numerous chance for me to do more report and I will be to practice my report writing skills and improving it along the way.

Effective communication is a rather heavy course due to the curriculum, from personal introduction to technical report and presentation is all well planned. If the main modules can reduce in the work load or lesser by modules, the student will benefit more from effective communication. SIT could have involved more industry professional to give the student a better inside to the industry and expectati0n.

In general, I had enjoyed myself during this course and definitely benefitted from it. Our lecturer Ms Gan had impart us with the knowledge for us to move forward in the course of civil engineering.

Mapletree Innovation & Entrepreneurship Forum

20/03/2019

The forum started at 6:30pm

Reflection

The guests present at the forum includes Mr Shamir, CEO of VersaFleet, Mr Eugene Wong, Venture Capitalist, Ms Nancy Ling, Co-Founder, EcoU and Mr Zach, MD AlfaTech & DVUCA.

Being an entrepreneur should not be just about making money, but also making a difference. It should be about making life better not only for ourselves, but for others as well mentioned by Mr Shamir. As what our school mate Alex had mentioned, it is difficult to be an entrepreneur. Most of them do not survive the first year of operation.

Entrepreneurs are not for everyone, you must be thirsty for pain and suffering while bringing your company to the next level. Entrepreneurs are born leaders which means they should be able to impart positivity with their employees. It’s not always about the money. There should also be harmony among coworkers.

Mr Zach emphasised greatly on the importance of customer service as such that he is even willing to get his hand dirty. I totally agree and admire his values, it is never about how good is your company or product but it is about to what extend will you be willing to service your customer.

Ms Nancy mentioned about copycat and she is not very worry about them. I agree partially as healthy competition can bring the company and business to the next level, stream lining processes, exploring other option and be more focus. On the other hand, copycat uses low cost or substandard materials and manufacture similar product might indirectly tarnish the original product. Moreover, these copycat will earn the additional amount for producing at lower cost.

At this century, entrepreneurs is not about inventing new products to solve real life problems it is more of the ability to gather different resources through a platform to provide a complete solution to the end customer. For example, Redmart, Amazon and Alibaba are very good platform that helps local business to reach out to the world at the minimum cost and risk. I find it totally worth it to try to be an entrepreneur at least once in a life time as the type of experience you gain is different from been a worker.

Peer review

Commented on joe’s introduction

https://uniworkvoon.wordpress.com/2019/01/24/10/

Commented on Alyssa introduction

Commented on Guam Xu critical relfection

https://danaquay.wordpress.com/2019/04/04/critical-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-58

Commented on Dana critical

Commented on the introduction

Summary Annotation

Chew K.C. (2010). Singapore’s strategies towards sustainable construction. The IES journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering, volume 3, 2010 – issue 3. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19373260.2010.491641

This article focuses on the role of building and construction authority and Singapore construction industry in implementing sustainable construction master plan. This masterplan consists of five strategic thrusts to achieve efficiency in using materials and resources and zero landfill. The five thrusts cover government initiatives in sustainable construction, promoting sustainable construction in private sector, build up industry capabilities, generate interest and awareness in sustainable materials and construction and setting the minimum standards for the implementation of sustainable construction. Under this master plan, Housing Development Board did a pilot test on using ash from incineration as alternative materials for road and private sector had started to recycle demolition waste and use them in the new buildings.  This article also presents some case study on sustainable construction, such as the development of demolition protocol and funding. as Chew’s aim with this article seems to be to persuade the engineers and construction industry to optimize the design to use natural or sustainable materials. This article provides in-depth information of the latest initiatives of sustainable construction in Singapore that will assist in the research topic. As the research topic is on usage of recycled materials in construction to reduce time and cost and at the same time reducing the carbon footprint is align to the article’s main idea of sustainable construction.

217 words

Reader Response Draft #3


In the article, “Boy Genius Boyan Slat’s Giant Ocean Machine Is Real”, Schiller (2017) explores the potential of a huge ocean cleaning initiative envisioned by Slat. According to the article, the discovery of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch by Charles Moore in 1997 inspired Slat to develop the Ocean Cleanup machine in 2011. The article states that Slat’s design functions as colossal floating booms that will entrap and gather waste which will allow for convenient disposal. He also made significant improvements to the design in hopes of increasing efficiency, reducing cost and saving time and effort. The Ocean Cleanup Foundation raised most of its fund from Silicon Valley. The revised design will be modular so that it can be scalable and operates independently. A former failed prototype provided insights to how Slat can improve on his design. He claims to have done extensive simulations on the booms and the Patch and estimated that tons of waste could be collected annually. Schiller learns about Slat’s long-term plans during a conversation in which he hopes to recycle the plastic waste into marketable products to finance the project. While Slat’s idea of building the Ocean Cleanup machine will improve the pollution in ocean, it fails to address the source of the problem of illegal dumping.

Firstly, Slat should had done an in-depth study to the problem of the ocean pollution. ChartsBin statistics collector team (2011) showed that 163 out of 195 countries studied had contributed to 98 million tonnes of illegal dumping. This illegal dumping will eventually end up in ocean by weather. The purpose of the ocean clean-up is to allow the marine ecosystem to recover, save the earth and preserve our food source but without stopping illegal dumping it is driving the pollution to a point of no return. The article did not mention where the source of the majority of the waste from as such that readers assume that they are from activity carried out on the ocean hence leading the readers to expect the ocean will be cleaned once the machine is deployed. Without the clear picture of the source of pollution, people will continue illegal dumping and the ocean will remain polluted.

Secondly, plastics are the main pollutants in illegal dumping and they end up in the ocean either uncollected, left out from the waste collection system or illegal dumping into river or sea. National Geographic (2010) highlighted that for plastics to be completed biodegrade is almost impossible. Dr Serena Teo (2018) had found out that plastics will break down into Nano size and trapped in marine’s creature which cannot be collected by the machine. This had proved that the machine is incompetent to clean up the ocean properly and the only way to solve the plastic problem is to start from preventing illegal dumping that was not stated in the article. Since the source of the ocean pollution was not mentioned, readers will not correlate illegal dumping with pollution in the ocean hence the machine will never clean up the ocean.

Lastly, Alo. B.T. (2018) listed some of the water pollutants such as pathogens and organic and inorganic materials that are not able to be detected easily yet they can cause the severe health problems in humans. These pollutants are from human or animal waste, heavy industrial activities and decomposition of living organisms. They are the common waste that is been illegally dumped. Failing to discuss illegal dumping in the article cause the readers to be unaware of the bad practices of unhygienic sanitary, untreated waste from heavy industries and illegal dumping of caresses or corpse into the ocean is polluting the ocean.

On top of deploying a machine to clean the ocean, we should focus more on policy, education, research and development and regulation to reduce illegal dumping. This mammoth effort has to begin with the governments to regulate waste management and encourage the use of renewable materials.

Reference

Alo. B.T. (2018) List of water pollutants. Retrieved from https://sciencing.com/list-water-pollutants-6309497.html

Annette M. (N.D.) Solutions for ocean pollution. Retrieved from https://greenliving.lovetoknow.com/Solutions_for_Ocean_Pollution

Brian H. (N.D.) 7 Ways To Reduce Ocean Plastic Pollution Today. Retrieved from http://www.oceanicsociety.org/blog/1720/7-ways-to-reduce-ocean-plastic-pollution-today

ChartsBin statistics collector team. (2011). Global Illegal Waste Dumping by Country. Retrieved from http://chartsbin.com/view/576.

Dr. Martini k. (2014) The Ocean Cleanup, Part 2: Technical review of the feasibility study. Retrieved from http://www.deepseanews.com/2014/07/the-ocean-cleanup-part-2-technical-review-of-the-feasibility-study/

Esteban, M.A., Meseguer, J., Cuesta, A. & Guardiola, F.A. (2012). Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture, Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Biology, University of Murcia. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291976/

Hannah L. (2018). Five Asian Countries Dump More Plastic Into Oceans Than Anyone Else Combined: How You Can Help. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/hannahleung/2018/04/21/five-asian-countries-dump-more-plastic-than-anyone-else-combined-how-you-can help/#4d5af8b91234

Helen B. (2018) Plastic patch in Pacific Ocean growing rapidly, study shows. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43490235

Kimberley C. (2018) Nanoplastics can accumulate in marine organisms’ bodies, NUS research finds. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/environment/nus-team-conducts-research-on-the-build-up-of-small-plastic-particles-in

Laura P. (2016) We made plastic. We depend on it. Now we’re drowning in it. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2018/06/plastic-planet-waste-pollution-trash-crisis/

Lauren S. (2018). Ocean plastic predicted to triple within a decade. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/21/health/ocean-plastic-intl/index.html

Liyana O. (2018) Nanoplastics found to accumulate in marine organisms, risk being transferred up food chain: NUS study. Retrieved From https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/plastic-pollution-nanoplastic-microplastic-ocean-nus-research-10292766

McKinsey & Company and Ocean Conservancy. (2015). Stemming the Tide: Land-based strategies for a plastic-free ocean. Retrieved from https://oceanconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/full-report-stemming-the.pdf

National Geographic. (2010) Marine Pollution. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/oceans/critical-issues-marine-pollution/

United Nation. (2011) Environmental indicators – waste. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/environment/wastetreatment.htm

World Wide Fund For Nature. (N.D.) How does plastic ends up in the ocean?. Retrieved from https://www.wwf.org.uk/updates/how-does-plastic-end-ocean

Reader Response Draft #2

In the article, “Boy Genius Boyan Slat’s Giant Ocean Machine Is Real”, Schiller (2017) explores the potential of a huge ocean cleaning initiative envisioned by Slat. According to the article, the discovery of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch by Charles Moore in 1997 inspried Slat to develop the Ocean Cleanup machine in 2011. The article states that Slat’s design functions as colossal floating booms that will entrap and gather waste which will allow for convenient disposal. He also made significant improvements to the design in hopes of increasing efficiency, reducing cost and saving time and effort. The Ocean Cleanup Foundation raised most of its fund from Silicon Valley. The revised design will be modular so that it can be scalable and operates independently. A former failed prototype provided insights to how Slat can improve on his design. He claims to have done extensive simulations on the booms and the Patch and estimated that tons of waste could be collected annually. Schiller learns about Slat’s long-term plans during a conversation in which he hopes to recycle the plastic waste into marketable products to finance the project. While Slat’s idea of building the Ocean Cleanup machine will improve the pollution in ocean, it fails to address the source of the problem of illegal dumping and irresponsible action of polluting the ocean.

First of all, plastic was invented in 1950 and since then its production had exploded to 448 million tons in 2015. Majority of the plastic produced did not get recycled but dump or burnt. Base on a report “Stemming the Tide: Land-based Strategies for a plastic-free ocean” (2015), suggested that land-based sources are responsible for 80 percent of the ocean pollution. These low resale value plastic that leak into the ocean is either uncollected, escape from the waste collection system or disposed into river or sea illegally. The Ocean Cleanup machine will not stop the continuous fuelling of the plastics waste into ocean.

Secondly, plastics are so prevalent in our life especially such as plastic bags, straw and bottles. These are single use product that causes most pollution. After use, it is conveniently threw on the street, at the beach or into river or drain. Eventually, these unwanted low residual value plastic find its way into the ocean contributing to the patch. The irresponsible action had contributed greatly to the pollution affecting the ocean ecosystem. In the article ‘Nanoplastics found to accumulate in marine organisms, risk being transferred up food chain: NUS study’ (2018), Dr Serena Teo mentioned: “It’s worrying, because this suggests that the organisms have a problem excreting and removing the nanoplastics, which increases the risk of bioaccumulation in the organisms, and subsequently into the rest of the food chain,”. Through this statement, it is clear that the plastics break down into micro and nano size as such that it will not be trap by the Slat’s machine therefore the ocean remains littered with plastics. This micro and nano size plastics will eventually consume by us as they are trap in the marines’ creatures.

Lastly, Slat’s machine is a novel idea but many aspects to the problem of the pollution in the ocean is not been answered. In the article ‘The Ocean Cleanup, Part 2: Technical review of the feasibility study’ (2014),Dr Martini stated: “Another fundamental problem that has not been adequately considered is biofouling – the inevitable growth of marine life on the structure – which will change the hydrodynamics and may add considerable load to the structure”. Through this statement, it explained that the Boom is still experiencing teething problem. The attachment of marine life to the Boom weights it down, reduce its efficiency and it will break down the boom slowly and contribute to the pollution. In order to prevent biofouling, the Boom have to be coated with biocidal antifoulants to kill the biogicial growth. In the article ‘Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture’ (2012) the authors stated: “The use of biocides in the aquatic environment, however, has proved to be harmful as it has toxic effects on the marine environment.”. From this statement, it is proven that coating the Boom with biocides will have toxic effect in the ocean hence contributing further to the pollution.

Instead of creating bigger waste (Ocean Cleanup machine) to collect those smaller ones in the ocean, we should focus on policy, education, research and development and regulation to cut down on the usage of plastic. This mammoth effort have to begin with the respective government to regulate all industries in waste management and encourage the use of renewable energy sources. The use of renewable energy sources reduces off-shore drilling hence discouraging the production of raw materials for plastic by petrol chemical companies.

Reference

McKinsey & Company and Ocean Conservancy. (September 2015). Stemming the Tide: Land-based strategies for a plastic-free ocean. Retrieved from https://oceanconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/full-report-stemming-the.pdf

Hannah Leung. (April 21, 2018). Five Asian Countries Dump More Plastic Into Oceans Than Anyone Else Combined: How You Can Help. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/hannahleung/2018/04/21/five-asian-countries-dump-more-plastic-than-anyone-else-combined-how-you-can help/#4d5af8b91234

WWF. HOW DOES PLASTIC END UP IN THE OCEAN?. Retrieved from https://www.wwf.org.uk/updates/how-does-plastic-end-ocean

Lauren Said-Moorhouse. (March 21, 2018). Ocean plastic predicted to triple within a decade. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/21/health/ocean-plastic-intl/index.html

Brian Hutchinson. 7 Ways To Reduce Ocean Plastic Pollution Today. Retrieved from http://www.oceanicsociety.org/blog/1720/7-ways-to-reduce-ocean-plastic-pollution-today

Annette McDermott. Solutions for Ocean Pollution. Retrieved from https://greenliving.lovetoknow.com/Solutions_for_Ocean_Pollution

Laura Parker. (August, 2016) WE MADE PLASTIC. WE DEPEND ON IT. NOW WE’RE DROWNING IN IT. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2018/06/plastic-planet-waste-pollution-trash-crisis/

Helen Briggs. (March 22, 2018) Plastic patch in Pacific Ocean growing rapidly, study shows. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43490235

National Geographic. (April 27, 2010) Marine Pollution. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/oceans/critical-issues-marine-pollution/

Liyana Othman. (May 31, 2018) Nanoplastics found to accumulate in marine organisms, risk being transferred up food chain: NUS study. Retrieved From https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/plastic-pollution-nanoplastic-microplastic-ocean-nus-research-10292766

Dr. Martini. (July 14, 2014) The Ocean Cleanup, Part 2: Technical review of the feasibility study. Retrieved from http://www.deepseanews.com/2014/07/the-ocean-cleanup-part-2-technical-review-of-the-feasibility-study/

Esteban, M.A., Meseguer, J., Cuesta, A. & Guardiola, F.A. (Feb 2, 2012). Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture, Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Biology, University of Murcia. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291976/

Reader Response Draft #1

In the article, “Boy Genius Boyan Slat’s Giant Ocean Machine Is Real”, Schiller (2017) explores the potential of a huge ocean cleaning initiative envisioned by Slat. According to the article, the discovery of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch by Charles Moore in 1997 inspried Slat to develop the Ocean Cleanup machine in 2011. The article states that Slat’s design functions as colossal floating booms that will entrap and gather waste which will allow for convenient disposal. He also made significant improvements to the design in hopes of increasing efficiency, reducing cost and saving time and effort. The Ocean Cleanup Foundation raised most of its fund from Silicon Valley. The revised design will be modular so that it can be scalable and operates independently. A former failed prototype provided insights to how Slat can improve on his design. He claims to have done extensive simulations on the booms and the Patch and estimated that tons of waste could be collected annually. Schiller learns about Slat’s long-term plans during a conversation in which he hopes to recycle the plastic waste into marketable products to finance the project.

While Slat’s idea of building the Ocean Cleanup machine will improve the pollution in ocean, it fails to address the source of the problem of illegal dumping and irresponsible action of polluting the environment.

First of all, plastic was invented in 1950 and since then its production had exploded to 448 million tons in 2015. Majority of the plastic produced did not get recycled but dump or burnt. Base on a report “Stemming the Tide: Land-based Strategies for a plastic-free ocean” (2015), suggested that land-based sources are responsible for 80 percent of the ocean pollution. These low resale value plastic that leak into the ocean is either uncollected, escape from the waste collection system or disposed into river or sea illegally. The Ocean Cleanup machine will not stop the continuous fuelling of the plastics waste into ocean.

Secondly, plastics are so prevalent in our life especially such as plastic bags, straw and bottles. These are single use product that causes most pollution. After use, it is conveniently threw on the street, at the beach or into river or drain. Eventually, these unwanted low residual value plastic find its way into the ocean contributing to the patch. The irresponsible action had contributed greatly to the pollution affecting the ocean ecosystem. In the article ‘Nanoplastics found to accumulate in marine organisms, risk being transferred up food chain: NUS study’ (2018), Dr Serena Teo mentioned: “It’s worrying, because this suggests that the organisms have a problem excreting and removing the nanoplastics, which increases the risk of bioaccumulation in the organisms, and subsequently into the rest of the food chain,”. Through this statement, it is clear that the plastics break down into micro and nano size as such that it will not be trap by the Slat’s machine therefore the ocean remains littered with plastics. This micro and nano size plastics will eventually consume by us as they are trap in the marines’ creatures.

Lastly, Slat’s machine is a novel idea but many aspects to the problem of the pollution in the ocean is not been answered. In the article ‘The Ocean Cleanup, Part 2: Technical review of the feasibility study’ (2014),Dr Martini stated: “Another fundamental problem that has not been adequately considered is biofouling – the inevitable growth of marine life on the structure – which will change the hydrodynamics and may add considerable load to the structure”. Through this statement, it explained that the Boom is still experiencing teething problem. The attachment of marine life to the Boom weights it down, reduce its efficiency and it will break down the boom slowly and contribute to the pollution. In order to prevent biofouling, the Boom have to be coated with biocidal antifoulants to kill the biogicial growth. In the article ‘Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture’ (2012) the authors stated: “The use of biocides in the aquatic environment, however, has proved to be harmful as it has toxic effects on the marine environment.”. From this statement, it is proven that coating the Boom with biocides will have toxic effect in the ocean hence contributing further to the pollution.

Instead of creating bigger waste (Ocean Cleanup machine) to collect those smaller ones in the ocean, we should focus on policy, education, research and development and regulation to cut down on the usage of plastic. This mammoth effort have to begin with the respective government to regulate all industries in waste management and encourage the use of renewable energy sources. The use of renewable energy sources reduces off-shore drilling hence discouraging the production of raw materials for plastic by petrol chemical companies.

Reference

McKinsey & Company and Ocean Conservancy. (September 2015). Stemming the Tide: Land-based strategies for a plastic-free ocean. Retrieved from https://oceanconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/full-report-stemming-the.pdf

Hannah Leung. (April 21, 2018). Five Asian Countries Dump More Plastic Into Oceans Than Anyone Else Combined: How You Can Help. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/hannahleung/2018/04/21/five-asian-countries-dump-more-plastic-than-anyone-else-combined-how-you-can help/#4d5af8b91234

WWF. HOW DOES PLASTIC END UP IN THE OCEAN?. Retrieved from https://www.wwf.org.uk/updates/how-does-plastic-end-ocean

Lauren Said-Moorhouse. (March 21, 2018). Ocean plastic predicted to triple within a decade. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/21/health/ocean-plastic-intl/index.html

Brian Hutchinson. 7 Ways To Reduce Ocean Plastic Pollution Today. Retrieved from http://www.oceanicsociety.org/blog/1720/7-ways-to-reduce-ocean-plastic-pollution-today

Annette McDermott. Solutions for Ocean Pollution. Retrieved from https://greenliving.lovetoknow.com/Solutions_for_Ocean_Pollution

Laura Parker. (August, 2016) WE MADE PLASTIC. WE DEPEND ON IT. NOW WE’RE DROWNING IN IT. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2018/06/plastic-planet-waste-pollution-trash-crisis/

Helen Briggs. (March 22, 2018) Plastic patch in Pacific Ocean growing rapidly, study shows. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43490235

National Geographic. (April 27, 2010) Marine Pollution. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/oceans/critical-issues-marine-pollution/

Liyana Othman. (May 31, 2018) Nanoplastics found to accumulate in marine organisms, risk being transferred up food chain: NUS study. Retrieved From https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/plastic-pollution-nanoplastic-microplastic-ocean-nus-research-10292766

Dr. Martini. (July 14, 2014) The Ocean Cleanup, Part 2: Technical review of the feasibility study. Retrieved from http://www.deepseanews.com/2014/07/the-ocean-cleanup-part-2-technical-review-of-the-feasibility-study/

Esteban, M.A., Meseguer, J., Cuesta, A. & Guardiola, F.A. (Feb 2, 2012). Risks of Using Antifouling Biocides in Aquaculture, Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Biology, University of Murcia. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291976/

Summary draft #2

In the article “Boy Genius Boyan Slat’s Giant Ocean Machine Is Real”, Schiller (2017) explores the potential of a huge ocean cleaning initiative envisioned by Slat. According to the article, the discovery of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch by Charles Moore in 1997 trigger Slat to develop the Ocean Cleanup machine in 2011. The article states that Slat’s design functions as colossal floating booms that will entrap and gather waste which will allow for convenient disposal. He also made significant improvements to the design in hopes of increasing efficiency, reducing cost and saving time and effort. The Ocean Cleanup Foundation had raised most of its fund from Silicon Valley. The revised design will be modular so that it can be scalable and operates independently. A former failed prototype had also provided insights on how Slat can improve on his design. He claims to have done extensive simulations on the booms and the Patch and had estimated that tons of waste could be collected annually. Schiller learns about Slat’s long-term plans during a conversation in which he hopes to recycle the plastic waste into marketable products to finance the project.

(189 words)

Summary draft 1

Article: Boy Genius Boyan Slat’s Giant Ocean Machine Is Real

In the article “Boy Genius Boyan Slat’s Giant Ocean Machine Is Real”, Schiller (2017) explores the potential of a huge ocean cleaning initiative envisioned by young prodigy, Slat. According to the article, in 1997, oceanographer Charles Moore uncovered the “Great Pacific Garbage Patch” which consist of accumulated plastic waste due to human activities. In response to this issue of environmental degradation, 17 years old Slat (2011) imagined a future possibilty of a “Ocean Cleanup machine” to clean up the “Patch”. Slat (2017) had made a formal statement to start this endeavour in 2018. The article states that Slat’s design functions as colossal floating “booms” that will entrap and gather waste which will allow for convenient disposal by boat at regular intervals. He also made significant changes to the design in hopes of increasing efficiency, reducing cost, saving time and effort. The article also mentions a prototype testing later in the year and how the project is funded by various companies and individuals. A former failed prototype had also provided insights on how Slat can improve on his design. Slat claims to have done extensive research on the “Patch” and estimated a clean up rate of “tens of thousands of tons” of waste per annum. Schiller learns about Slat’s long term plans during a conversation in which he(Slat) hopes to recycle the plastic waste into useful products and for more companies to invest in the clean up project.

11/1/19

Assignment#1: The Learning Portfolio

Subject: Self-introductory letter
Dear Ms Gan,

I am Tan yuqing, a Year 1 Civil engineering student attending your effective communication module. I am one of the Work and Study Programme’s student.

I had graduated from Singapore polytechnic in 2003 with a diploma in Electrical, Electronic and Communication and got a placement in NTU, computer engineering course. I graduated from NTU with a 2nd lower honours in computer engineering in 2010.

Shortly after I graduated, I joined DSTA as a System Administrator. After working as a System Administrator for a year, I felt that the job was not suitable for me hence I decided joined the construction sector. After a few years of working, I realised that I needed to gain relevant knowledge and accreditation in the field of civil engineering therefore returned to school in 2018.

My goal for studying in this course is to gain more in-depth technical knowledge and understand the industry best practices. Eventually, I would like to be registered as a professional engineer.

In terms of strength in communication, I find that I am able to converse my idea effectively to my audience. In the construction industry, it is very critical to project your idea clearly. Typically in a construction project, the service my company provides involve various parties hence sequencing of the job is very critical. I was able to coordinate a few parities to understand their needs and propose a well-thought-out plan to the developer to ensure no delay to the project.

On the other hand, I felt that my weakness in communication is in my sentence structure and choice of words as they are lack of emphasis. During various discussions that I had with consultants, I had a hard time trying to convey to them that some of their ideas is impossible to be built. If I had chosen better words with various degree of seriousness, I might able to express myself clearer and emphasising on the key points.

During my previous education, I had been through similar module and I am still looking forward to refresh and brush up on my English and to learn new concept in preparing presentation slides that will leave a deep impression.

Best regards,

Tan yuqing
Student ID: 1801371

(Amended 23/01/2019)

(Amended 25/1/2019)

(Amended 02/04/2019)